Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 40 — Protection of Environment · Part 52 · § 52.237

§ 52.237. Part D disapproval.

1,043 words·~5 min read·/us/cfr/t40/s§ 52.237·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)The following portions of the California SIP are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act.
(1)The ozone and CO attainment demonstrations for the South Coast Air Basin. No major stationary source, or major modification of a stationary source, of carbon monoxide or volatile organic compounds may be constructed in the South Coast Air Basin unless the construction permit application is complete on or before August 30, 1988.
(2)The ozone attainment demonstration for Ventura County. No major stationary source, or major modification of a stationary source, of volatile organic compounds may be constructed in the Ventura County nonattainment area unless the construction permit application is complete on or before November 4, 1988.
(3)The ozone attainment demonstration for the Sacramento AQMA. No major stationary source, or major modification of a stationary source, of volatile organic compounds may be constructed in the Sacramento nonattainment area unless the construction permit application is complete on or before January 3, 1989.
(4)The ozone attainment demonstration for the Fresno County APCD.
(5)The ozone attainment demonstration for the Kern County APCD.
(6)The attainment assessment, motor vehicle emissions budgets, and Reasonably Available Control Measure
(RACM)portions of the San Francisco Bay Area Ozone Attainment Plan for the 1-Hour National Ozone Standard, June 1999.
(7)[Reserved]
(8)The contingency measure portion of the 2008 PM2.5 Plan for attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 standards in the San Joaquin Valley (June 2013).
(9)[Reserved]
(10)[Reserved]
(11)[Reserved]
(12)The contingency measures portion of the 2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.5 Standards (“2018 PM2.5 Plan”), adopted November 15, 2018, for San Joaquin Valley with respect to the 1997 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
(13)The contingency measures element of the “2016 Ozone Plan for 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard,” adopted June 16, 2016, as modified by the “2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan,” adopted October 25, 2018, for San Joaquin Valley with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS, with the exception of CARB's Enhanced Enforcement Activities Program measure.
(14)The contingency measures element of the “Sacramento Regional 2008 NAAQS 8-hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan,” adopted November 16, 2017, as modified by the “2018 Updates to the California State Implementation Plan,” adopted October 25, 2018, for the Sacramento Metro area with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
(b)The following Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT)determinations are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act.
(1)Sacramento Air Quality Management District.
(i)[Reserved]
(ii)RACT Determinations for the source category Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (EPA-453/B-16-001) for the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS, as contained in the submittal titled “California Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities,” dated December 4, 2018, as adopted March 23, 2017 and submitted on December 11, 2018.
(iii)[Reserved]
(2)[Reserved]
(3)San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
(i)RACT Determinations for the source category Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (EPA-453/B-16-001) for the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS, as contained in the submittal titled “California Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities,” dated December 4, 2018, as adopted March 23, 2017 and submitted on December 11, 2018.
(ii)[Reserved]
(4)South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(i)RACT Determinations for the source category Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (EPA-453/B-16-001) for the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS, as contained in the submittal titled “California Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities,” dated December 4, 2018, as adopted March 23, 2017 and submitted on December 11, 2018.
(ii)[Reserved]
(5)Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
(i)RACT Determinations for the source category Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (EPA-453/B-16-001) for the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS, as contained in the submittal titled “California Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities,” dated December 4, 2018, as adopted March 23, 2017 and submitted on December 11, 2018.
(ii)[Reserved]
(6)Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District.
(i)RACT Determinations for the source category Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (EPA-453/B-16-001) for the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS, as contained in the submittal titled “California Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities,” dated December 4, 2018, as adopted March 23, 2017 and submitted on December 11, 2018.
(ii)[Reserved]
(c)The following Clean Air Act section 185 fee rules, and the section 185 program plan element for the specified NAAQS, are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act.
(1)Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.
(i)Rule 315, “Federal Clean Air Act Section 185 Penalty,” amended on October 18, 2011, and submitted on December 14, 2011, for the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
(ii)[Reserved]
(2)Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.
(i)Rule 315, “Federal Clean Air Act Section 185 Penalty,” amended on October 24, 2011, and submitted on December 14, 2011, for the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
(ii)[Reserved] [46 FR 5979, Jan. 21, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 53118, Nov. 25, 1983; 50 FR 35798; Sept. 4, 1985; 53 FR 1781, Jan. 22, 1988; 53 FR 39088, Oct. 5, 1988; 53 FR 48537, Dec. 1, 1988; 55 FR 9878, 9880, Mar. 16, 1990; 56 FR 2853, Jan. 25, 1991; 66 FR 48347, Sept. 20, 2001; 81 FR 22032, Apr. 14, 2016; 81 FR 29501, May 12, 2016; 81 FR 53283, Aug. 12, 2016; 83 FR 5927, Feb. 12, 2018; 85 FR 77999, Dec. 3, 2020; 86 FR 49482, Sept. 3, 2021; 86 FR 67343, 67349, Nov. 26, 2021; 87 FR 4507, Jan. 28, 2022; 87 FR 38668, June 29, 2022; 87 FR 59024, Sept. 29, 2022; 87 FR 59320, Sept. 30, 2022; 87 FR 59692, Oct. 3, 2022; 88 FR 2541, Jan. 17, 2023; 88 FR 39182, June 15, 2023; 88 FR 42252, 42258, June 30, 2023; 88 FR 86608, Dec. 14, 2023; 89 FR 18547, Mar. 14, 2024; 89 FR 78258, Sept. 25, 2024; 89 FR 80766, Oct. 4, 2024]
Connections6 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 52.237
Part D disapproval.
Fed. Reg.×6
Cites 0Cited by 6 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.